For Families With Nonspeaking Autistic Children, a Fierce Debate Over Assisted Spelling

Communication methods used by some nonspeaking autistic people have generated disagreement among researchers, clinicians, and families over which approaches are supported by scientific evidence. Facilitated communication and spelling-based methods like rapid prompting method have attracted both supporters who report their children communicating for the first time and skeptics who cite studies questioning whether the communication originates from the user or the facilitator. The debate centers on how to verify whether these methods reliably capture a person's own thoughts and words. Families report that their nonspeaking autistic children have produced writing, poetry, and other outputs through these techniques, while some researchers argue that controlled studies have not demonstrated independent communication through these approaches.

Next story